I’m back. CPAC week came and went. Then another week came and went after the horrible cold I got at CPAC. But now I’m healthy again and it’s time to start catching up. Though there’s no way I’m going to post on every tidbit I’ve run across in the last two weeks, I can try to hit the highlights.
And let’s start with the fact that the Internet Kill Switch is back under a new name. Susan Collins and Joe Lieberman have reintroduced the bill under a new name. They think if they put freedom in the name that we’ll ignore the problems inherent in giving the President emergency powers to wage economic war on America. The Internet Kill Switch is a broken idea. We don’t let the President close supermarkets nationwide if one butcher in one city has an e. coli outbreak. We can’t apply the same overreaction online.
Also while I’ve been out of it, House Republicans have been busy. As I understand it, we’ve not only grilled the administration on the “Stimulus” spending on communications, but we’ve also passed an amendment to the continuing resolution in order to defund Net Neutrality. I love it. Our Energy and Commerce leadership in the House has so much going on, including Obamacare, but they seem to relish the opportunity to strike back so much and so hard at the administration’s illegal overreaching. From the cheap seats, Greg Walden, Fred Upton, and others are doing a great job.
Fun fact: when the House debated Net Neutrality defunding, the Democrats very strangely started making arguments that government should leave the Internet alone. Anna Eshoo said “I would not fool around with an open, accessible Internet.” Hey, for once we agree.
By the way, fun fact: Net Neutrality is so terrible for innovation and customer service that ISPs turned down ARRA money to try to stay away from it. Yes, they turned down free money from the government because regulation is just that costly.
Further, the Net Neutrality coalition continues to crumble. Collin Petersen, Democrat of Minnesota, flipped sides by voting for defunding NN after voting for NN last Congress. Perhaps he noticed the total wipeout in 2010 of PCCC candidates pledged to support Net Neutrality. Every single Democrat who signed the PCCC Net Neutrality pledge went on to lose in November.
Meanwhile, Julius Genachowski and the FCC still don’t get the message. He thinks he’s entitled to debate the Congress instead of taking orders. Greg Walden announced plans to pressure him on transparency, which should help teach him who’s boss, you’d think.
Though we have to give Genachowski credit on one thing: He admits the Netflix/Level 3/Comcast issue is not a violation of Net Neutrality.
Michael Copps, pet commissioner of neo-Marxists everywhere, deserves no credit though. He’s now pushing for more speech controls in the name of “disclosure.” It’s about control and gathering power in Washington.
The FCC still needs lots of oversight, though, as conflicts of interest continue to crop up, this time with an FCC official having PBS as an employer.
I have more to write on in the coming days on Google and Copyright, especially the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) which threatens to continue the criminalization of copyright law in America and expands government online in the name of protecting a few big companies. Watch this space.
I’m back. CPAC week came and went. Then another week came and went after the horrible cold I got at CPAC. But now I’m healthy again and it’s time to start catching up. Though there’s no way I’m going to post on every tidbit I’ve run across in the last two weeks, I can try to hit the highlights.
And let’s start with the fact that the Internet Kill Switch is back under a new name. Susan Collins and Joe Lieberman have reintroduced the bill under a new name. They think if they put freedom in the name that we’ll ignore the problems inherent in giving the President emergency powers to wage economic war on America. The Internet Kill Switch is a broken idea. We don’t let the President close supermarkets nationwide if one butcher in one city has an e. coli outbreak. We can’t apply the same overreaction online.
Also while I’ve been out of it, House Republicans have been busy. As I understand it, we’ve not only grilled the administration on the “Stimulus” spending on communications, but we’ve also passed an amendment to the continuing resolution in order to defund Net Neutrality. I love it. Our Energy and Commerce leadership in the House has so much going on, including Obamacare, but they seem to relish the opportunity to strike back so much and so hard at the administration’s illegal overreaching. From the cheap seats, Greg Walden, Fred Upton, and others are doing a great job.
Fun fact: when the House debated Net Neutrality defunding, the Democrats very strangely started making arguments that government should leave the Internet alone. Anna Eshoo said “I would not fool around with an open, accessible Internet.” Hey, for once we agree.
By the way, fun fact: Net Neutrality is so terrible for innovation and customer service that ISPs turned down ARRA money to try to stay away from it. Yes, they turned down free money from the government because regulation is just that costly.
Further, the Net Neutrality coalition continues to crumble. Collin Petersen, Democrat of Minnesota, flipped sides by voting for defunding NN after voting for NN last Congress. Perhaps he noticed the total wipeout in 2010 of PCCC candidates pledged to support Net Neutrality. Every single Democrat who signed the PCCC Net Neutrality pledge went on to lose in November.
Meanwhile, Julius Genachowski and the FCC still don’t get the message. He thinks he’s entitled to debate the Congress instead of taking orders. Greg Walden announced plans to pressure him on transparency, which should help teach him who’s boss, you’d think.
Though we have to give Genachowski credit on one thing: He admits the Netflix/Level 3/Comcast issue is not a violation of Net Neutrality.
Michael Copps, pet commissioner of neo-Marxists everywhere, deserves no credit though. He’s now pushing for more speech controls in the name of “disclosure.” It’s about control and gathering power in Washington.
The FCC still needs lots of oversight, though, as conflicts of interest continue to crop up, this time with an FCC official having PBS as an employer.
I have more to write on in the coming days on Google and Copyright, especially the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) which threatens to continue the criminalization of copyright law in America and expands government online in the name of protecting a few big companies. Watch this space.
BenchCraft, LLC announced that it'll debut its Concert Sequence, a brand new line of recliners with an integrated sound strategy, at Higher Stage Marketplace on October 17-22, 2009. Concert Series recliners function two built-in stereo speakers and a subwoofer built exclusively to produce a total array of sound. It's got tactile motors which may both vibrate together with the sound or be put into use independently as a massage system, and separate controls that enable for individual adjustments for being created towards the volume, bass/treble, and also the tactile/massage element. The technique, which will have a starting up total price point of $699, will also incorporate a mini audio jack so users can connect to their numerous audio resources (i.e. iPods, MP3 gamers, cell phones, and so forth.). To that conclude, Sinning mentioned that Berkline will also be introducing in choose movement
bench craft company reviews
furnishings its new eCoupled solutions option--a wireless charging station for digital units which includes cell phones, MP3 players, and laptops. Designed by Fulton Innovation, it eliminates the might need for energy cords by developing an electromagnetic conduit blended with an intelligent command system that often monitors electrical power flow so a number of gadgets from distinctive manufactures can charge at the same time. eCoupled technological know-how is additionally secure for electronic devices due to the fact it can provide only the amount of energy
bench craft company reviews
needed to keep a gadget at peak vitality levels, so there is certainly no danger of overcharging. Despite the fact that the quantity of products compatible with this particular technological know-how is minimal, Berkline expects that a lot more and more manufacturers will move toward incorporating the capability to connect to your eCoupled purpose
The Bench Craft Company gives you no excuses for that tricky perform and perseverance that they commit on their own to in order to preserve themselves because the leader in nationwide onsite golf course property
bench craft company reviews
marketing. No excuses for providing their customers with the most detailed protection for his or her bench craft company reviews advertising dollar no matter if it be locally or nationwide. No excuses for delivering golf program properties by far the most seamless plan for producing more earnings inside the most non-intrusive way, even while enhancing the top notch for the facilities combined with the practical knowledge of their golfers on their house. Bench Craft is committed to staying the most beneficial as well as the main at what they do, marketing on golf course bench craft company reviews venues.
In an age in which nobody
bench craft company reviews
would like to consider obligation for anything, Bench Craft would make itself totally accountable for that good results of their promoting clients, which is why their purchasers and perfectly as Bench Craft continuously experience nutritious progress rates and profit margins. A company cannot be any longer
bench craft company reviews
productive than their purchaser, so it really is target of Bench Craft to make particular that each customer receives the perfect likely venue for presenting their prospects
bench craft company reviews
products and solutions and solutions, whether or not it be locally or nationally. This commitment to top quality is what sets Bench Craft aside from its competitors, and dollar for dollar would make its promoting services a lot of the most priceless within the industry.
The golf programs bench craft company reviews that Bench Craft Company functions in concert with, receive services and solutions at no expense. Bench Craft Company gross sales crew right money this product for each golf course by obtaining sponsors for every merchandise. Nearby vendors and players with the neighborhood acquire sponsorship priority and golf course management works closely with Bench Craft to recognize probable sponsors. Bench Craft’s highly prosperous
bench craft company reviews
procedure gives golf courses a free of cost alternate that also eliminates prices because of this of structure improvements, program modifications, theft and vandalism.
As getting a definite additional benefit, every single program is safeguarded under a $3,000,000 liability policy. The organization can accommodate almost each golf program. Additionally, Bench Craft Company functions jointly with all branches with the Armed Forces, combined with state, county and metropolis golf courses. This collection of golf courses provides Bench Craft’s clientele with the most extensive protection of golf course properties inside U.s..
The ahead
bench craft company reviews
pondering Visionaries at Bench Craft Company created a procedure that garners the attention and participation of not simply its personal sales staff, but the sponsors, golf program management in addition to the membership and patrons. There’s only one Bench Craft Company, don’t fall for rip off plots by imposters operating a scam.
bench craft company reviews
No comments:
Post a Comment